CodeRabbit author
Gowtham Kishore Vijay
6 articles · writing here since May 2026
Latest article
Claude Opus 5.5 for code review: More catches, different misses
We tested Opus 5.5 against our production reviewer to see which bugs it catches, which it misses, and whether higher reasoning effort actually improves the results.
More articles by Gowtham Kishore Vijay
Fable 5.1 review: Coding tests and code review results
Read CodeRabbit’s Fable 5.1 review, including coding tasks, code review results, latency, and the trade-offs to test before switching models.
09.01.26
GPT-5.6 Sol and Terra: Coding, code review, and cost
Compare GPT-5.6 Sol and Terra for coding agents and code review. Explore CodeRabbit’s benchmark results, follow-through, review quality, and cost trade-offs.
07.09.26
Claude Sonnet 5 review: Coding, code review, and cost
Compare Claude Sonnet 5 with Sonnet 4.6 and flagship models using hands-on coding work, CodeRabbit review results, and practical cost trade-offs.
06.30.26
Fable 5 review: Coding tasks and code review results
See how Fable 5 performs in coding tasks and CodeRabbit’s review tests, including bug coverage, comment precision, and long-running agent behavior.
06.09.26
Opus 4.8 benchmark results for AI code review and code generation
Opus 4.8 is the best model we have used for long-horizon agentic coding and code generation, and it holds its own on code review out of the box.
05.28.26